<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hidden Quantcast links on Digg.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/</link>
	<description>UK SEO Services Company in London - SEOgadget.co.uk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:36:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mrpals</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-5984</link>
		<dc:creator>mrpals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-5984</guid>
		<description>I agree with Binh Nguyen....we can see so many like this.

Not just quantcast doing this. Most major traffic tracking website, theme, and directory insert this type of hidden link in the code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Binh Nguyen&#8230;.we can see so many like this.</p>
<p>Not just quantcast doing this. Most major traffic tracking website, theme, and directory insert this type of hidden link in the code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binh Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-4310</link>
		<dc:creator>Binh Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-4310</guid>
		<description>Not just quantcast doing this. Most major traffic tracking website, theme, and directory insert this type of hidden link in the code.

That&#039;s how they rank themselves. 

What I think is they should let the user opt in to link. Yes they provide free service, but that free always somehow end up some cash deposit into their bank. They should be honest about it.

Thanks for this great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just quantcast doing this. Most major traffic tracking website, theme, and directory insert this type of hidden link in the code.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how they rank themselves. </p>
<p>What I think is they should let the user opt in to link. Yes they provide free service, but that free always somehow end up some cash deposit into their bank. They should be honest about it.</p>
<p>Thanks for this great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Generator</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-3370</link>
		<dc:creator>Generator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-3370</guid>
		<description>I have placed quantcast code to my web pages but it is still under review and there&#039;s no show of my website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have placed quantcast code to my web pages but it is still under review and there&#8217;s no show of my website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardbaxterseo</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>richardbaxterseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1349</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard interesting code there - it&#039;s very similar except the alt is blank. Did the cached version of the page you found that on still show a crawlable text link in the &quot;text only&quot; view?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard interesting code there &#8211; it&#8217;s very similar except the alt is blank. Did the cached version of the page you found that on still show a crawlable text link in the &#8220;text only&#8221; view?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>Oops

Not only managed to mispell my name, but the code posted got pulled. Here it is escaped:

&lt;noscript&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.omniture.com&quot; title=&quot;Web Analytics&quot;&gt;&lt;img 
src=&quot;http://homesteadtechnologies.122.2o7.net/b/ss/ht-homesteadcom1/1/H.14--NS/0&quot;
height=&quot;1&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops</p>
<p>Not only managed to mispell my name, but the code posted got pulled. Here it is escaped:</p>
<p>&lt;noscript&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.omniture.com&#8221; title=&#8221;Web Analytics&#8221;&gt;&lt;img<br />
src=&#8221;http://homesteadtechnologies.122.2o7.net/b/ss/ht-homesteadcom1/1/H.14&#8211;NS/0&#8243;<br />
height=&#8221;1&#8243; width=&#8221;1&#8243; border=&#8221;0&#8243; alt=&#8221;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eichard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator>Eichard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1299</guid>
		<description>Many Analytics companies are at this. Check out the tracking code used by Omniture:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.omniture.com&quot; title=&quot;Web Analytics&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

[not sure why they are setting the title and not the alt]

If memory serves me right ClickTracks do something very similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many Analytics companies are at this. Check out the tracking code used by Omniture:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.omniture.com" title="Web Analytics" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
<p>[not sure why they are setting the title and not the alt]</p>
<p>If memory serves me right ClickTracks do something very similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardbaxterseo</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>richardbaxterseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in agreement here - it looks like a classic example of checking the SEO impact before you distribute &quot;copy and paste&quot; code. Oops!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in agreement here &#8211; it looks like a classic example of checking the SEO impact before you distribute &#8220;copy and paste&#8221; code. Oops!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Miller</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1197</guid>
		<description>@Stuart I&#039;m not so sure this falls into black hat territory, since the link anchor text is &quot;Quantcast&quot; and not a juicy keyword phrase such as &quot;viagra&quot;. The href is probably unnecessary but may not violate any guidelines. If it does and GOOG takes action, the penalty would likely impact Quantcast.com and not Digg.com or any other site hosting the tracking tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stuart I&#8217;m not so sure this falls into black hat territory, since the link anchor text is &#8220;Quantcast&#8221; and not a juicy keyword phrase such as &#8220;viagra&#8221;. The href is probably unnecessary but may not violate any guidelines. If it does and GOOG takes action, the penalty would likely impact Quantcast.com and not Digg.com or any other site hosting the tracking tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the discussion.  Just a heads-up that we dropped the href a while back, so it only appears on sites that became Quantified Publishers before we made the change.  New sites don&#039;t have that line -- and I think that if you recopy-and-paste your tag from the setup page you&#039;ll get the new tag without that href.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the discussion.  Just a heads-up that we dropped the href a while back, so it only appears on sites that became Quantified Publishers before we made the change.  New sites don&#8217;t have that line &#8212; and I think that if you recopy-and-paste your tag from the setup page you&#8217;ll get the new tag without that href.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardbaxterseo</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1195</link>
		<dc:creator>richardbaxterseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1195</guid>
		<description>@FSP - the whos.amung.us non java tracking code could potentially be doing the same thing. Nice spot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@FSP &#8211; the whos.amung.us non java tracking code could potentially be doing the same thing. Nice spot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FSP</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>FSP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>Cool find.  I too have the quantcast code on my site.  It does not require a link back to use an image to track visitors, however they add it anyway. (look at whos.amung.us as well)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool find.  I too have the quantcast code on my site.  It does not require a link back to use an image to track visitors, however they add it anyway. (look at whos.amung.us as well)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Foster</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>Now that is an interesting link building strategy. To bad it is black hat however...this could end badly for Quantcast...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that is an interesting link building strategy. To bad it is black hat however&#8230;this could end badly for Quantcast&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark Pilatowski</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator>mark Pilatowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1190</guid>
		<description>Somehow I doubt this is a mere oversight. I am a little surprised that some of these sites did not catch this themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I doubt this is a mere oversight. I am a little surprised that some of these sites did not catch this themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Leonhardt</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>David Leonhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>Not worth the risk.  I recall how BMW was removed from the index a few years ago for being naughty (according to Google).   Does Quantcast want the same result?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not worth the risk.  I recall how BMW was removed from the index a few years ago for being naughty (according to Google).   Does Quantcast want the same result?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardbaxterseo</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>richardbaxterseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy, good to hear from you! I don&#039;t think this is spam nessecarily, in fact it&#039;s probably just an oversight on the part of the developers of the tracking code. Still, I bet the technique is working for them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy, good to hear from you! I don&#8217;t think this is spam nessecarily, in fact it&#8217;s probably just an oversight on the part of the developers of the tracking code. Still, I bet the technique is working for them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/hidden-quantcast-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=561#comment-1188</guid>
		<description>Certainly a year or so back they weren&#039;t being naughty on the links, but at least it probably points back to a useful page for many sites which has info advertisers might like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly a year or so back they weren&#8217;t being naughty on the links, but at least it probably points back to a useful page for many sites which has info advertisers might like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.457 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-14 06:17:30 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->