<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Page level penalty for comment spam &#8211; rankings and traffic drop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/</link>
	<description>UK SEO Services Company in London - SEOgadget.co.uk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seo Optimization</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-13180</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-13180</guid>
		<description>how your page in SERP within 24 hours!!!!!!

great interesting read. Thankz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how your page in SERP within 24 hours!!!!!!</p>
<p>great interesting read. Thankz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo Trends</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-12833</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-12833</guid>
		<description>Great review. thanks for sharing this very forwarded idea.i use twitter only for this. search engine marketing tips´s last blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review. thanks for sharing this very forwarded idea.i use twitter only for this. search engine marketing tips´s last blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fargham</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-12832</link>
		<dc:creator>Fargham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-12832</guid>
		<description>quite interesting, but congrat. you got traffic back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quite interesting, but congrat. you got traffic back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maqbool Ahmad</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-9635</link>
		<dc:creator>Maqbool Ahmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-9635</guid>
		<description>Very well written. This is the kind of information that is useful to those want to increase their SERP’s. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well written. This is the kind of information that is useful to those want to increase their SERP’s. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Article Alley</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-8216</link>
		<dc:creator>Article Alley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-8216</guid>
		<description>I had a similar experience with a travel blog I ran - I found that if you don&#039;t have the time to check things really really carefully its better to disable comments entirely - its so easy for this sort of thing to happen and for traffic to take a hit.

At least things bounced back and you spotted the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar experience with a travel blog I ran &#8211; I found that if you don&#8217;t have the time to check things really really carefully its better to disable comments entirely &#8211; its so easy for this sort of thing to happen and for traffic to take a hit.</p>
<p>At least things bounced back and you spotted the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-6873</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-6873</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, I didn&#039;t really think about the negative effects of Comments on your sites SEO, however I agree with most people here that say it was a text filter.

Also search results can vary if a Data Center is having problems, sometimes searching the same keyword yeilds different results because it depends on which data center you&#039;re hitting. I&#039;d say it was the words (Which I&#039;ll omit) ticking off the safe filter.
This makes me want to write about it myself on http://green.cx but I think I&#039;ll just link you instead! You did such a good and through writeup!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, I didn&#8217;t really think about the negative effects of Comments on your sites SEO, however I agree with most people here that say it was a text filter.</p>
<p>Also search results can vary if a Data Center is having problems, sometimes searching the same keyword yeilds different results because it depends on which data center you&#8217;re hitting. I&#8217;d say it was the words (Which I&#8217;ll omit) ticking off the safe filter.<br />
This makes me want to write about it myself on <a href="http://green.cx" rel="nofollow">http://green.cx</a> but I think I&#8217;ll just link you instead! You did such a good and through writeup!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOPlay</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4936</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOPlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4936</guid>
		<description>Excellent job paying close attention to your traffic. Even better job communicating this information in a clear, concise manner. Makes me worry about massive comments and the time necessary to manage them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent job paying close attention to your traffic. Even better job communicating this information in a clear, concise manner. Makes me worry about massive comments and the time necessary to manage them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rothko</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4900</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rothko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4900</guid>
		<description>Since you have to check your comments anyway to filter out the bad ones, I do not see why moderating them upfront would be a problem.  Especially blogs with open commenting are prone to be misused by spammers and now that they have find you out, you are going to have to monitor your comments very closely from now on. Therefore, I think IBL builder has point although he puts it rather bluntly.
But I understand where you come from, moderating conversations doesn&#039;t work encouraging, that is absolutely true. 
However, you can get around this problem by allowing trusted commenters to publish automatically. There is a setting for it this.  In other words: if you have approved a comment for the first time, the commenter will then be able to comment next time without the need for approval. Secondly, you can filter comments that have more then one link.  That&#039;s another firewall for spam.
Hope this helps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you have to check your comments anyway to filter out the bad ones, I do not see why moderating them upfront would be a problem.  Especially blogs with open commenting are prone to be misused by spammers and now that they have find you out, you are going to have to monitor your comments very closely from now on. Therefore, I think IBL builder has point although he puts it rather bluntly.<br />
But I understand where you come from, moderating conversations doesn&#8217;t work encouraging, that is absolutely true.<br />
However, you can get around this problem by allowing trusted commenters to publish automatically. There is a setting for it this.  In other words: if you have approved a comment for the first time, the commenter will then be able to comment next time without the need for approval. Secondly, you can filter comments that have more then one link.  That&#8217;s another firewall for spam.<br />
Hope this helps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardbaxterseo</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4899</link>
		<dc:creator>richardbaxterseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4899</guid>
		<description>@IBL builder

I recieve a lot of comments. I would never be able to manually moderate them all, not to mention the fact that comments moderatated tend to extinguish conversation between commenters. It&#039;s not &quot;naive&quot; to allow comments on a blog, it&#039;s intentional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@IBL builder</p>
<p>I recieve a lot of comments. I would never be able to manually moderate them all, not to mention the fact that comments moderatated tend to extinguish conversation between commenters. It&#8217;s not &#8220;naive&#8221; to allow comments on a blog, it&#8217;s intentional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBL Builder</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4898</link>
		<dc:creator>IBL Builder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4898</guid>
		<description>Am I alone in thinking &quot;so what&quot;.  If you are naive enough in this day and age to allow comments onto your blog without moderation, then why would you be surprised by Google&#039;s response when they find them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I alone in thinking &#8220;so what&#8221;.  If you are naive enough in this day and age to allow comments onto your blog without moderation, then why would you be surprised by Google&#8217;s response when they find them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rothko</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4897</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rothko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4897</guid>
		<description>Askimet works with a list of known spam messages.  In that sense it is perfect, but you cannot do anything against a person who fills in a spam message by hand.
But it is a lot less, and I mean really a lot less then without the protection from Askimet, so I would donate some money towards those guys as they really do a good job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Askimet works with a list of known spam messages.  In that sense it is perfect, but you cannot do anything against a person who fills in a spam message by hand.<br />
But it is a lot less, and I mean really a lot less then without the protection from Askimet, so I would donate some money towards those guys as they really do a good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4895</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4895</guid>
		<description>wow.. nice post. I thought akismet is close to perfection. huhuhu.. i learned a lot, comments do affect rankings. :D thank u!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow.. nice post. I thought akismet is close to perfection. huhuhu.. i learned a lot, comments do affect rankings. <img src='http://seogadget.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  thank u!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rothko</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4862</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rothko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4862</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I meant to say that it is not abnormal that some spam escapes Askimet :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant to say that it is not abnormal that some spam escapes Askimet <img src='http://seogadget.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rothko</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4861</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rothko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4861</guid>
		<description>I have my comments set to approval before they are published, so this sort of problem won&#039;t happen to me.  Indeed, there are actually quite a few spam comments that escape Askimet and that is not normal, automation only goes up to a point.  
Thanks for the insight.  I didn&#039;t know it would affect a site so fast.
Keep up the good work :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have my comments set to approval before they are published, so this sort of problem won&#8217;t happen to me.  Indeed, there are actually quite a few spam comments that escape Askimet and that is not normal, automation only goes up to a point.<br />
Thanks for the insight.  I didn&#8217;t know it would affect a site so fast.<br />
Keep up the good work <img src='http://seogadget.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo In Abruzzo</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4848</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo In Abruzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4848</guid>
		<description>Nice post. Interesting, but not sure that a bunch of comment can attract the attenction of Google penalty system.
I&#039;ve a site of a company who I manage that seems page level penalized, and it&#039;s a standard plain html web site, without comment, so the reason must be searched somewhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. Interesting, but not sure that a bunch of comment can attract the attenction of Google penalty system.<br />
I&#8217;ve a site of a company who I manage that seems page level penalized, and it&#8217;s a standard plain html web site, without comment, so the reason must be searched somewhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twitrounds</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4840</link>
		<dc:creator>twitrounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4840</guid>
		<description>Great post! We allow comments on our site and it&#039;s good to look out for this stuff. Fortunately we don&#039;t allow comments to be posted without approval so hopefully we never run into this problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! We allow comments on our site and it&#8217;s good to look out for this stuff. Fortunately we don&#8217;t allow comments to be posted without approval so hopefully we never run into this problem!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DennisG</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4838</link>
		<dc:creator>DennisG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4838</guid>
		<description>Really interesting stuff.
I really hate those comment spammers, and I always make sure all posts are closed when I have no way of moderating the comments while I&#039;m kicking it on the beach. But it makes me sad that my readers don&#039;t have the chance of interacting with me while I&#039;m sipping on a cocktail.

Thanks for sharing this. Very helpful

Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting stuff.<br />
I really hate those comment spammers, and I always make sure all posts are closed when I have no way of moderating the comments while I&#8217;m kicking it on the beach. But it makes me sad that my readers don&#8217;t have the chance of interacting with me while I&#8217;m sipping on a cocktail.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing this. Very helpful</p>
<p>Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardbaxterseo</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4833</link>
		<dc:creator>richardbaxterseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4833</guid>
		<description>@Wiep Hello mate. Actually &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/willcritchlow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Will&lt;/a&gt; at Distilled said the same thing last night. 

As far as the totally different rankings go, perhaps a possible indicator of how a shorter term index may be deployed in case the main index changes unexpectedly when a penalty occurs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wiep Hello mate. Actually <a href="http://twitter.com/willcritchlow" rel="nofollow">Will</a> at Distilled said the same thing last night. </p>
<p>As far as the totally different rankings go, perhaps a possible indicator of how a shorter term index may be deployed in case the main index changes unexpectedly when a penalty occurs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassiano Travareli</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4832</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassiano Travareli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4832</guid>
		<description>Really Interesting this post.

It´s a flag to pay more attention in the comment links, mainly after the changes on nofollow rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really Interesting this post.</p>
<p>It´s a flag to pay more attention in the comment links, mainly after the changes on nofollow rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiep</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-page-penalty-for-comment-spam-rankings-and-traffic-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-4831</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=1553#comment-4831</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with Tonnie here - it looks a bit like a text filter. I know it&#039;s too late now, but I&#039;d like to know if your website would show up with SafeSearch turned off...

Also, the complete top 4 for &#039;virtualbox guest additions&#039; is different in both screen shots. Could you think of an explanation for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with Tonnie here &#8211; it looks a bit like a text filter. I know it&#8217;s too late now, but I&#8217;d like to know if your website would show up with SafeSearch turned off&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, the complete top 4 for &#8216;virtualbox guest additions&#8217; is different in both screen shots. Could you think of an explanation for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.433 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-14 08:54:54 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->