<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Keyword Tool [External vs Beta] – What’s the Difference?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seogadget.co.uk/google-keyword-tool-external-vs-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-keyword-tool-external-vs-beta/</link>
	<description>UK SEO Services Company in London - SEOgadget.co.uk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: richardbaxterseo</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-keyword-tool-external-vs-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-7086</link>
		<dc:creator>richardbaxterseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=2122#comment-7086</guid>
		<description>Hi Zac! Thanks for the kind comments. Indeed - I decided to leave out a review of the functionality as I mentioned, Google have done that &lt;a href=&quot;http://adwords.blogspot.com/2009/09/updated-versions-of-keyword-and.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;quite ably over on their blog&lt;/a&gt;. That said, I also think they&#039;ve done a nice job of the (new) tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Zac! Thanks for the kind comments. Indeed &#8211; I decided to leave out a review of the functionality as I mentioned, Google have done that <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2009/09/updated-versions-of-keyword-and.html" rel="nofollow">quite ably over on their blog</a>. That said, I also think they&#8217;ve done a nice job of the (new) tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac Zheng</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-keyword-tool-external-vs-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-7085</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac Zheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=2122#comment-7085</guid>
		<description>Nice comparison of keywords volumes. However, you forgot to mention the other key features:

1) Categories - now able to select keywords within certain categories
2) Exact / Phrase / Broad in the same list, rather than having to choose between them with the old tool
3) Filter keywords box at the bottom left - able to display keywords containing certain words. This is a killer feature! Very useful for filtering out irrelevant keywords

I&#039;m enjoying your blog!
Zac</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice comparison of keywords volumes. However, you forgot to mention the other key features:</p>
<p>1) Categories &#8211; now able to select keywords within certain categories<br />
2) Exact / Phrase / Broad in the same list, rather than having to choose between them with the old tool<br />
3) Filter keywords box at the bottom left &#8211; able to display keywords containing certain words. This is a killer feature! Very useful for filtering out irrelevant keywords</p>
<p>I&#8217;m enjoying your blog!<br />
Zac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardbaxter</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-keyword-tool-external-vs-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-6532</link>
		<dc:creator>richardbaxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=2122#comment-6532</guid>
		<description>No problem Steve, I&#039;ll drop you a line when it&#039;s done. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem Steve, I&#039;ll drop you a line when it&#039;s done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardbaxter</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-keyword-tool-external-vs-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-6533</link>
		<dc:creator>richardbaxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=2122#comment-6533</guid>
		<description>Fair point and I tend to agree David. I&#039;m really glad they&#039;re splitting Mobile and Web based queries! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point and I tend to agree David. I&#039;m really glad they&#039;re splitting Mobile and Web based queries!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-keyword-tool-external-vs-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-6531</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=2122#comment-6531</guid>
		<description>Nice work Richard. 
 
It&#039;s really difficult to tell what the exact defintion of some of the measures as Google provides no or unclear guidance.  My hunch is that some of the differences you are seeing are due to slightly differing measurements.  I believe (but can&#039;t verify) that the beta tool; 
- Splits out mobile queries 
- Shows monthly average volumes for the last 12 months for local queries 
 
Where as the old tool; 
- Lumps together mobile queries with web-based searches 
- Shows volumes from the latest month for local queries </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work Richard. </p>
<p>It&#039;s really difficult to tell what the exact defintion of some of the measures as Google provides no or unclear guidance.  My hunch is that some of the differences you are seeing are due to slightly differing measurements.  I believe (but can&#039;t verify) that the beta tool;<br />
- Splits out mobile queries<br />
- Shows monthly average volumes for the last 12 months for local queries </p>
<p>Where as the old tool;<br />
- Lumps together mobile queries with web-based searches<br />
- Shows volumes from the latest month for local queries</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SocialMan</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-keyword-tool-external-vs-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-6530</link>
		<dc:creator>SocialMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=2122#comment-6530</guid>
		<description>Well, if you think that the previous Keyword tool was over-reporting it all makes sense. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you think that the previous Keyword tool was over-reporting it all makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Morgan</title>
		<link>http://seogadget.co.uk/google-keyword-tool-external-vs-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-6529</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=2122#comment-6529</guid>
		<description>Look forward to that &quot;different blog post&quot; you mentioned! Whilst I understand that keyword tool data is flawed from a prediction point of view the disparity between Google&#039;s own tools just highlights the FUD that is deliberately propagated. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look forward to that &quot;different blog post&quot; you mentioned! Whilst I understand that keyword tool data is flawed from a prediction point of view the disparity between Google&#039;s own tools just highlights the FUD that is deliberately propagated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
