Comments on: Dave Naylor’s SEO Strategies To Make A Splash http://seogadget.co.uk/dave-naylors-seo-strategies/ UK SEO Services Company in London - SEOgadget.co.uk Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:49:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Mika http://seogadget.co.uk/dave-naylors-seo-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-6633 Mika Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:54:25 +0000 http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=2248#comment-6633 Thank you for the wrap-up. Some good points are given there.. sad that i can't be there this time. It's always great (and fun) to listen to Sessions with Dave :) Thank you for the wrap-up. Some good points are given there.. sad that i can’t be there this time. It’s always great (and fun) to listen to Sessions with Dave :)

]]> By: css-notconvinced http://seogadget.co.uk/dave-naylors-seo-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-6600 css-notconvinced Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:26:32 +0000 http://seogadget.co.uk/?p=2248#comment-6600 Manipulating CSS to get content to the top?? Seriously?? Out of the billions of web developers out there building billions of sites we have to go against web standards and semantic html just to put content at the top. There has got to be less that 0.000000000000001% of those billion sites out there that do that. We were doing that for years on our brand. We gave up in favour of correct structure. We saw no ranking loss. Not one to concern over as far as I am concerned. Everything else, very informative. Excellent break down from Dave and thanks to Richard for posting this. Manipulating CSS to get content to the top?? Seriously??

Out of the billions of web developers out there building billions of sites we have to go against web standards and semantic html just to put content at the top. There has got to be less that 0.000000000000001% of those billion sites out there that do that.

We were doing that for years on our brand. We gave up in favour of correct structure. We saw no ranking loss. Not one to concern over as far as I am concerned.

Everything else, very informative. Excellent break down from Dave and thanks to Richard for posting this.

]]>